[Pubmed] Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cells in Myasthenia Gravis: Advances, Safety Challenges, and Future Directions

Intégration des publications parues sur PUBMED
Répondre
Avatar du membre

Auteur du sujet
RSS-Bot
Ami(e) de Diamant
Ami(e) de Diamant
Messages : 6503
Enregistré le : 31 mai 2020 09:57
6
Zodiaque :
Âge : 22
Contact :
    unknown unknown

[Pubmed] Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cells in Myasthenia Gravis: Advances, Safety Challenges, and Future Directions

Message par RSS-Bot »


Muscle Nerve. 2026 Apr 10. doi: 10.1002/mus.70222. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

This review examines the emerging application of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in myasthenia gravis (MG), with emphasis on safety, efficacy signals, and future therapeutic potential in treatment-refractory disease. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, medRxiv, bioRxiv, and Google Scholar for studies published between January 1, 2010 and July 1, 2025, using the terms "CAR T-cell," "chimeric antigen receptor," and "myasthenia gravis." Eligible reports included clinical trials, case reports, case series, and mechanistic studies describing CAR T-cell therapy outcomes in MG. Across five independent case series, seven patients receiving CAR T-cells targeting CD19, BCMA, or bispecific antigens showed consistent clinical improvement. Peak expansion occurred 8-22 days postinfusion, with persistence of 28 to ~180 days. Despite small cohorts, safety in CAR T-cell therapy was favorable versus oncology, with mainly Grade 1-2 cytokine release syndrome, rare immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity, and no severe or life-threatening events. Seven registered trials (> 260 patients) are expected to conclude between 2026 and 2029. Overall, CAR T-cell therapy shows substantial promise for treatment-refractory MG, potentially offering greater durability than existing therapies with an acceptable safety profile. Nevertheless, current evidence is restricted to small, uncontrolled studies, and long-term efficacy, durability, and optimal patient selection require validation in larger controlled trials.

PMID:41958278 | DOI:10.1002/mus.70222


Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4195827 ... t6+133c1fe
Si vous appréciez notre travail, merci de nous soutenir un petit don en cliquant ICI

Pour obtenir la traduction en français,
cliquez sur le bouton situé dans la barre des menus en haut de cette page 

Image


Pour les donateurs, si cet article vous intéresse, nous pouvons faire l’acquisition d'un tiré-à-part.
Merci d'en faire la demande sur [email protected]


Bonne lecture...
Répondre

Retourner vers « Echos de la recherche »