[pubmed] Identifying a Patient-Centered Outcome Measure for a Comparative Effectiveness Treatment Trial in Myasthenia Gr
-
RSS-Bot
Auteur du sujet - Ami(e) de Diamant

- Messages : 6501
- Enregistré le : 31 mai 2020 09:57
- 6
- Zodiaque :
- Âge : 22
- Contact :
[pubmed] Identifying a Patient-Centered Outcome Measure for a Comparative Effectiveness Treatment Trial in Myasthenia Gr
Muscle Nerve. 2021 Oct 23. doi: 10.1002/mus.27443. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION/AIM: Data regarding the comparative effectiveness of myasthenia gravis (MG) treatments is not available. We used patient input to identify a patient-centered outcome measure (PCOM) for PROMISE-MG, a comparative effectiveness trial of myasthenia gravis (MG) treatments.
METHODS: 1. A questionnaire survey was administered to 58 people with MG at the patient meeting of the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA), evaluating the impact of MG-related symptoms and MG treatments on patients' lives. 2. An online focus group of 13 patients with MG was conducted. 3. A potential outcome measure was selected. 4. The selected PCOM was evaluated by patients to assess how completely and accurately it captured their experiences with MG.
RESULTS: The patient survey found that limb weakness had the most impact on patients' lives. Weight gain, mood swings, insomnia and diarrhea were the most bothersome treatment side effects. Avoiding hospitalization was very important. Focus group participants reported fatigue as one of the most bothersome symptoms and differentiated it from myasthenic weakness. They defined an ideal treatment as having minimal or no side effects and an 80% improvement in symptoms.
DISCUSSION: Based on patient input, the Myasthenia Gravis- quality of life 15-revised scale (MG-QOL15r), a validated patient-reported outcome measure (PRO) was selected as the primary PCOM for PROMISE-MG. Avoiding hospitalization and having minimal-to-no treatment adverse effects, were selected as additional outcome measures. The patient centeredness of a PRO depends on the context of a study: PROs should be evaluated for appropriateness as a PCOM for every study. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
PMID:34687458 | DOI:10.1002/mus.27443
Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3468745 ... 3&v=2.15.0
Si vous appréciez notre travail, merci de nous soutenir un petit don en cliquant ICI
Pour obtenir la traduction en français,
cliquez sur le bouton situé dans la barre des menus en haut de cette page

Pour les donateurs, si cet article vous intéresse, nous pouvons faire l’acquisition d'un tiré-à-part.
Merci d'en faire la demande sur [email protected]
Bonne lecture...
Pour obtenir la traduction en français,
cliquez sur le bouton situé dans la barre des menus en haut de cette page

Pour les donateurs, si cet article vous intéresse, nous pouvons faire l’acquisition d'un tiré-à-part.
Merci d'en faire la demande sur [email protected]
Bonne lecture...





