[Pubmed] Sugammadex and neuromuscular disease: a systematic review with assessment of reporting quality and content vali
-
RSS-Bot
Auteur du sujet - Ami(e) de Diamant

- Messages : 6514
- Enregistré le : 31 mai 2020 09:57
- 6
- Zodiaque :
- Âge : 22
- Contact :
[Pubmed] Sugammadex and neuromuscular disease: a systematic review with assessment of reporting quality and content vali
Br J Anaesth. 2024 Jul 11:S0007-0912(24)00309-X. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.05.015. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Efficacy and safety of sugammadex for the reversal of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) in patients with neuromuscular diseases remains unclear. We summarised the available evidence and evaluated the quality of data reporting and the validity of published reports.
METHODS: We searched for reports (any design) on the usage of sugammadex (any regimen) for the reversal of an NMBA in patients (any age) with any neuromuscular disease. We used a modified CARE checklist (maximum score 23) to assess the quality of data reporting and an original specific validity checklist (maximum score 41) that was developed through a Delphi process.
RESULTS: We retrieved 126 observational reports (386 patients). Most dealt with myasthenia gravis patients receiving rocuronium. The train-of-four ratio returned to ≥0.9 in 258 of 265 (97.4%) patients in whom neuromonitoring was used. Adverse events occurred in 14 of 332 (4.2%) patients in whom adverse events were reported as present or absent. In 90 case reports, the median score of the 23-point CARE checklist was 13.5 (inter-quartile range [IQR] 11-16). In all 126 reports, the median score of the 41-point validity checklist was 23 (IQR 20-27). Scores were positively correlated.
CONCLUSIONS: These uncontrolled observations (of mainly low to moderate quality and validity) do not allow confident assessment of the efficacy and safety of sugammadex for the reversal of NMBAs in patients with neuromuscular diseases. Reporting of observational data should follow established guidelines, include specific information to ensure validity, and emphasise what the new data add to current knowledge.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL: PROSPERO 2019 (CRD42019119924).
PMID:38997841 | DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2024.05.015
Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3899784 ... t9+e462414
Si vous appréciez notre travail, merci de nous soutenir un petit don en cliquant ICI
Pour obtenir la traduction en français,
cliquez sur le bouton situé dans la barre des menus en haut de cette page

Pour les donateurs, si cet article vous intéresse, nous pouvons faire l’acquisition d'un tiré-à-part.
Merci d'en faire la demande sur [email protected]
Bonne lecture...
Pour obtenir la traduction en français,
cliquez sur le bouton situé dans la barre des menus en haut de cette page

Pour les donateurs, si cet article vous intéresse, nous pouvons faire l’acquisition d'un tiré-à-part.
Merci d'en faire la demande sur [email protected]
Bonne lecture...





